[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201005201423.09075@zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 14:23:07 +0400
From: "Nikita V. Youshchenko" <yoush@...msu.su>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Sujit K M <sjt.kar@...il.com>, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PREEMPT_RT (2.6.33-rt17) disabled printk-to-console after console_init
> > >>> Well, obviously it's unsafe if you remove safety checks. And if
> > >>> you care to look at the changelog of kernel/printk.c you'll find
> > >>> out why.
> > >>
> > >> Hmm... did a quick look and could not find anything related there.
> > >> Could you please give a pointer?
>
> Gah, yes. The changelog of the commit is not really helpful. Let me
> explain:
>
> The console drivers might take locks, which are converted to "sleeping
> locks" in preempt-rt. As a result we cannot call into those drivers
> from atomic contexts. And that's what the checks in the printk code
> prevent.
I've already understood that when looking at that code some weeks ago.
Still questions:
1) why does that prevent klogd from working?
2) why does print not pass to non-CON_ATOMIC even if called from non-atomic
context?
3) I believe that 8250 serial driver is aware of preempt-rt.
Could you please comment on my "2.6.33.2-rt13: RFC: fix serial console"
post to linux-rt-users list
(http://eeek.borgchat.net/lists/linux-rt-users/msg05569.html)
Nikita
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists