lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BF517FE.1000103@tuxonice.net>
Date:	Thu, 20 May 2010 21:07:42 +1000
From:	Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...onice.net>
To:	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
CC:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.jf.intel.com>,
	Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>,
	Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	ego@...ibm.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
	Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@...a.org.au>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/7] sched: change nohz idle load balancing logic to push
 model

Hi.

I finally found the time to give this patch series a try. Minor updates 
were required, but I'm now running it against 2.6.34.

"Load balancing tick" is still number one in my powertop list of top 
causes of wakeups (sitting at ~60 to 80 per second as I type this, with 
~170 wakeups per second total). Comparing this to the numbers I posted 
earlier, we seem to have a win.

I do wonder, though, whether further work could still be done. If I take 
one core offline, for example, I'm still getting load balancing ticks. 
Intuitively, I'd expect there to be no need for them with only one core 
available. But maybe I'm just ignorant of what's going on.

Regards,

Nigel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ