linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100520014628.GL4720@trinity.fluff.org>
Date:	Thu, 20 May 2010 02:46:28 +0100
From:	Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Pannaga Bhushan <p.bhushan@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the  tree

On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 11:04:11AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Ben,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the samsung tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/gpiolib.c between commit
> ea5f50706385b61c1c0d24271bbe7c6e93129fbc ("ARM: S5PV210: Add GPIOlib
> support") from Linus' tree and commit
> 026fcae436e846b0cc1db8d4af11890dfdde3689 ("ARM: S5PV210: Add S5PV210 GPIO
> support") from the samsung tree.
> 
> Two versions of the same commit.  I used the version in Linus' tree as
> that was dated later.

sorry, the tree that went to linus had that one replaced due to a minor
bug in the GPH banks that got fixed. Decided to replace the patch than
put a patch ontop.

-- 
Ben

Q:      What's a light-year?
A:      One-third less calories than a regular year.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/