[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <38232.1274368903@localhost>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 11:21:43 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Subject: mmotm 2010-05-19 - Kconfig dependency list from hell...
On Wed, 19 May 2010 16:13:09 PDT, akpm@...ux-foundation.org said:
> The mm-of-the-moment snapshot 2010-05-19-16-12 has been uploaded to
>
> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
Looks like some code to sort the dependency list and eliminate duplicates is
called for. I hit '?' on a new prompt, and saw this:
CONFIG_COMEDI_FC:
Enable support for shared functions for low-level drivers.
This module is not used directly by end-users. Rather, it
is used by many other comedi drivers.
To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module will be
called comedi_fc.
Symbol: COMEDI_FC [=n]
Prompt: Comedi shared functions for low-level driver support
Defined at drivers/staging/comedi/Kconfig:1294
Depends on: STAGING [=y] && !STAGING_EXCLUDE_BUILD [=n]
Location:
-> Device Drivers
-> Staging drivers (STAGING [=y])
-> Exclude Staging drivers from being built (STAGING_EXCLUDE_BUILD [=n])
Selected by: COMEDI_TEST [=n] && STAGING [=y] && !STAGING_EXCLUDE_BUILD [=n]
&& COMEDI_MISC_DRIVERS [=n] || COMEDI_DAS16M1 [=n] && STAGING [=y] &&
!STAGING_EXCLUDE_BUILD [=n] && COMEDI_ISA_DRIVERS [=n] && ISA [=n] ||
COMEDI_DAS16 [=n] && STAGING [=y] && !STAGING_EXCLUDE_BUILD [=n] &&
COMEDI_ISA_DRIVERS [=n] && ISA [=n] || COMEDI_DAS800 [=n] && STAGING [=y] &&
!STAGING_EXCLUDE_BUILD [=n] && COMEDI_ISA_DRIVERS [=n] && ISA [=n] ||
COMEDI_DAS1800 [=n] && STAGING [=y] && !STAGING_EXCLUDE_BUILD [=n] &&
COMEDI_ISA_DRIVERS [=n] && ISA [=n] || COMEDI_DT282X [=n] && STAGING [=y] &&
!STAGING_EXCLUDE_BUILD [=n] && COMEDI_ISA_DRIVERS [=n] && ISA [=n] ||
COMEDI_ADDI_APCI_3001 [=n] && STAGING [=y] && !STAGING_EXCLUDE_BUILD [=n] &&
COMEDI_PCI_DRIVERS [=n] && PCI [=y] || COMEDI_ADDI_APCI_3120 [=n] && STAGING
[=y] && !STAGING_EXCLUDE_BUILD [=n] && COMEDI_PCI_DRIVERS [=n] && PCI [=y] ||
COMEDI_ADL_PCI9111 [=n] && STAGING [=y] && !STAGING_EXCLUDE_BUILD [=n] &&
COMEDI_PCI_DRIVERS [=n] && PCI [=y] || COMEDI_ADL_PCI9118 [=n] && STAGING [=y]
&& !STAGING_EXCLUDE_BUILD [=n] && COMEDI_PCI_DRIVERS [=n] && PCI [=y] ||
COMEDI_AMPLC_PCI224 [=n] && STAGING [=y] && !STAGING_EXCLUDE_BUILD [=n] &&
COMEDI_PCI_DRIVERS [=n] && PCI [=y] || COMEDI_GSC_HPDI [=n] && STAGING [=y] &&
!STAGING_EXCLUDE_BUILD [=n] && COMEDI_PCI_DRIVERS [=n] && PCI [=y] ||
COMEDI_CB_PCIDAS64 [=n] && STAGING [=y] && !STAGING_EXCLUDE_BUILD [=n] &&
COMEDI_PCI_DRIVERS [=n] && PCI [=y] || COMEDI_CB_PCIDAS [=n] && STAGING [=y] &&
!STAGING_EXCLUDE_BUILD [=n] && COMEDI_PCI_DRIVERS [=n] && PCI [=y] ||
COMEDI_S626 [=n] && STAGING [=y] && !STAGING_EXCLUDE_BUILD [=n] &&
COMEDI_PCI_DRIVERS [=n] && PCI [=y] || COMEDI_NI_MIO_CS [=n] && STAGING [=y] &&
!STAGING_EXCLUDE_BUILD [=n] && COMEDI_PCMCIA_DRIVERS [=n] && PCMCIA [=y] &&
COMEDI_NI_TIO [=n] && COMEDI_NI_COMMON [=n] || COMEDI_USBDUXFAST [=n] &&
STAGING [=y] && !STAGING_EXCLUDE_BUILD [=n] && COMEDI_USB_DRIVERS [=n] && USB
[=y] || COMEDI_NI_LABPC [=n] && STAGING [=y] && !STAGING_EXCLUDE_BUILD [=n] &&
COMEDI_NI_COMMON [=n]
(Last line wrapped for readability). That includes these dups:
19 !STAGING_EXCLUDE_BUILD [=n]
18 STAGING [=y]
9 COMEDI_PCI_DRIVERS [=n]
5 COMEDI_ISA_DRIVERS [=n]
It would probably be harder to reduce these:
1 PCI [=y] || COMEDI_S626 [=n]
1 PCI [=y] || COMEDI_NI_MIO_CS [=n]
1 PCI [=y] || COMEDI_GSC_HPDI [=n]
1 PCI [=y] || COMEDI_CB_PCIDAS64 [=n]
1 PCI [=y] || COMEDI_CB_PCIDAS [=n]
1 PCI [=y] || COMEDI_AMPLC_PCI224 [=n]
1 PCI [=y] || COMEDI_ADL_PCI9118 [=n]
1 PCI [=y] || COMEDI_ADL_PCI9111 [=n]
1 PCI [=y] || COMEDI_ADDI_APCI_3120 [=n]
1 ISA [=n] || COMEDI_DT282X [=n]
1 ISA [=n] || COMEDI_DAS800 [=n]
1 ISA [=n] || COMEDI_DAS1800 [=n]
1 ISA [=n] || COMEDI_DAS16 [=n]
1 ISA [=n] || COMEDI_ADDI_APCI_3001 [=n]
(Is there a reason these don't print with () around them? It looks like it
needs them to enforce proper semantics...)
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists