[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100520123155.c4b7a1ed.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 12:31:55 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...nel.org, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] posix_timer: fix error path in timer_create
On Mon, 17 May 2010 21:18:07 +0400
Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org> wrote:
> move CLOCK_DISPATCH(which_clock, timer_create, (new_timer)) after all
> posible EFAULT erros.
>
> *_timer_create may allocate/get resources.
> (for example posix_cpu_timer_create does get_task_struct)
>
You've added a Cc:stable@...nel.org to the mail headers, but there is
no "Cc: <stable@...nel.org>" in the changelog. Please, if you think a
patch should go into -stable then add the tag to the changelog also -
this is more reliable and explicit than spraying things at a mailing
list.
You cc'ed stable@...nel.org on all three patches but IMO only [2/3]
(this patch) is needed in -stable.
And afaict, the bug which this patch fixes will allow a suitably-nasty
unprivileged application to leak an unbounded number of task-structs,
which is a box-killing local DoS. So yes, -stable wants this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists