[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikMBdX5HMrqVs9U2IJLldQ7nQXJ8ivKg4POdFEn@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 16:30:07 -0700
From: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Waychison <mikew@...gle.com>,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>,
Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] rwsem: down_read_critical infrastructure support
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 6:34 AM, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
> Can I suggest you change this to:
>
> enum rwsem_waiter_type {
> RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_WRITE,
> RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_READ,
> RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_UNFAIR_READ
> };
>
> and then change:
>
>> unsigned int flags;
>
> to:
>
> enum rwsem_waiter_type type;
>
> and use this throughout. It simplifies some of the code too. See attached
> patch.
Makes perfect sense assuming we don't plan to add more flags in the future.
I'll use this in V4 series.
> - if (flags & RWSEM_UNFAIR)
> + if (type & RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_UNFAIR_READ)
if (type == RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_UNFAIR_READ)
--
Michel "Walken" Lespinasse
A program is never fully debugged until the last user dies.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists