[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100521124641.GQ30801@buzzloop.caiaq.de>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 14:46:41 +0200
From: Daniel Mack <daniel@...aq.de>
To: Hemanth V <hemanthv@...com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] misc : ROHM BH1780GLI Ambient light sensor Driver
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 06:10:00PM +0530, Hemanth V wrote:
> >On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 05:05:50PM +0530, Hemanth V wrote:
> >>+ mutex_lock(&ddata->lock);
> >>+
> >>+ error = bh1780_write(ddata, BH1780_REG_CONTROL, val, "CONTROL");
> >>+ if (error < 0) {
> >>+ mutex_unlock(&ddata->lock);
> >>+ return error;
> >>+ }
> >>+
> >>+ msleep(BH1780_PON_DELAY);
> >
> >Hmm, what do you wait for here?
>
> Settling time delay required before lux read out
I thought so, but in fact you're just delaying the next two lines by
that:
> >>+ ddata->power_state = val;
> >>+ mutex_unlock(&ddata->lock);
... which doesn't make sense to me.
I can believe there is need to wait for the value to settle, but I think
it's the wrong place where you're doing it currently.
> >>+static int __devinit bh1780_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> >>+ const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> >>+{
> >>+ int ret;
> >>+ struct bh1780_data *ddata = NULL;
> >
> >The initialization isn't needed.
>
> This is basically added for the first goto error, to prevent
> any garbage values
Sorry, you're right. Ignore this comment :)
Thanks,
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists