[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1274451498.1674.1706.camel@laptop>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 16:18:18 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: rostedt@...dmis.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] perf, trace: Use per-tracepoint-per-cpu hlist to
track events
On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 10:04 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 11:02 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > plain text document attachment (perf-trace-per-cpu-fold.patch)
> > Avoid the swevent hash-table by using per-tracepoint hlists.
> >
> > Also, avoid conditionals on the fast path by ordering with probe unregister
> > so that we should never get on the callback path without the data being there.
> >
>
> > -void perf_trace_disable(int event_id)
> > +void perf_trace_destroy(struct perf_event *p_event)
> > {
> > - struct ftrace_event_call *event;
> > + struct ftrace_event_call *tp_event = p_event->tp_event;
> > + int i;
> >
> > - mutex_lock(&event_mutex);
> > - list_for_each_entry(event, &ftrace_events, list) {
> > - if (event->id == event_id) {
> > - perf_trace_event_disable(event);
> > - module_put(event->mod);
> > - break;
> > + if (--tp_event->perf_refcount > 0)
> > + return;
> > +
>
> You remove the event_mutex and then update the tp_event->perf_refcount
> without any protection.
>
> That tp_event->perf_refcount is global to the event not to the perf
> event.
Oh, bugger, yes. I seem to have lost it on destroy..
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists