[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1274412373.4977.8.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 05:26:13 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Adam Litke <agl@...ibm.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Izik Eidus <ieidus@...hat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Mike Travis <travis@....com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>, bpicco@...hat.com,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: Transparent Hugepage Support #25
Le vendredi 21 mai 2010 à 02:05 +0200, Andrea Arcangeli a écrit :
> If you're running scientific applications, JVM or large gcc builds
> (see attached patch for gcc), and you want to run from 2.5% faster for
> kernel build (on bare metal), or 8% faster in translate.o of qemu (on
> bare metal), 15% faster or more with virt and Intel EPT/ AMD NPT
> (depending on the workload), you should apply and run the transparent
> hugepage support on your systems.
>
> Awesome results have already been posted on lkml, if you test and
> benchmark it, please provide any positive/negative real-life result on
> lkml (or privately to me if you prefer). The more testing the better.
>
Interesting !
Did you tried to change alloc_large_system_hash() to use hugepages for
very large allocations ? We currently use vmalloc() on NUMA machines...
Dentry cache hash table entries: 2097152 (order: 12, 16777216 bytes)
Inode-cache hash table entries: 1048576 (order: 11, 8388608 bytes)
IP route cache hash table entries: 524288 (order: 10, 4194304 bytes)
TCP established hash table entries: 524288 (order: 11, 8388608 bytes)
0xffffc90000003000-0xffffc90001004000 16781312 alloc_large_system_hash+0x1d8/0x280 pages=4096 vmalloc vpages N0=2048 N1=2048
0xffffc9000100f000-0xffffc90001810000 8392704 alloc_large_system_hash+0x1d8/0x280 pages=2048 vmalloc vpages N0=1024 N1=1024
0xffffc90005882000-0xffffc90005c83000 4198400 alloc_large_system_hash+0x1d8/0x280 pages=1024 vmalloc vpages N0=512 N1=512
0xffffc90005c84000-0xffffc90006485000 8392704 alloc_large_system_hash+0x1d8/0x280 pages=2048 vmalloc vpages N0=1024 N1=1024
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists