[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <y0maartf8ve.fsf@fche.csb>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 13:43:49 -0400
From: fche@...hat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler)
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] perf, trace: Remove IRQ-disable from perf/tracepoint interaction
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> writes:
> [...]
> @@ -799,13 +799,10 @@ perf_trace_templ_##call(struct ftrace_ev
> static notrace void perf_trace_##call(proto) \
> { \
> struct ftrace_event_call *event_call = &event_##call; \
> - struct pt_regs *__regs = &get_cpu_var(perf_trace_regs); \
> - \
> - perf_fetch_caller_regs(__regs, 1); \
> - \
> - perf_trace_templ_##template(event_call, __regs, args); \
> + struct pt_regs __regs; \
> \
> - put_cpu_var(perf_trace_regs); \
> + perf_fetch_caller_regs(&__regs, 1); \
> + perf_trace_templ_##template(event_call, &__regs, args); \
> }
> [...]
To what extent are you worried about something the size of struct
pt_regs being auto/stack allocated?
- FChE
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists