[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BF6C7B6.2020008@euromail.se>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 19:49:42 +0200
From: Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
CC: Ping Cheng <pinglinux@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@...ia.com>,
Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@...-t.net>,
Benjamin Tissoires <tissoire@...a.fr>,
Stephane Chatty <chatty@...c.fr>,
Rafi Rubin <rafi@...s.upenn.edu>,
Michael Poole <mdpoole@...ilus.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] input: mt: Document the MT event slot protocol (rev3)
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>
> I guess this is where our disconnect lies as when I am looking at the
> event names I view all *_MT_* events as related to the multitouch
> protocol handling.
>
Yes. It is true that slot control is MT related, but I am looking at this from
the perspective of future expansions like KEY_MT, KEY_REL, and such, finding a
way to signal to user space which events are handled via slots. If we had
ABS_MT_SLOT, we would most likely get applications which store ABS_MT_SLOT as an
attribute of the slot together with ABS_MT_POSITION_X, ABS_MT_TOUCH_MAJOR, etc,
which is just not right. So the proposal is ABS_SLOT. May we have your verdict,
please. :-)
Henrik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists