linux-kernel - Re: RFC: dirty

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 20 May 2010 23:18:03 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	lwoodman@...hat.com
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: RFC: dirty_ratio back to 40%

From: Larry Woodman <lwoodman@...hat.com>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 07:20:42 -0400

> Increasing the dirty_ratio to 40% will regain the performance loss
> seen in several benchmarks.  Whats everyone think about this???

I've been making this change via sysctl on every single system I have,
and have been doing so for quite some time.

When doing a lot of GIT operations to a non-SSD disk the kernel simply
can't submit the writes early enough to prevent everything getting
backlogged, and then processes pile up being forced to sleep on I/O
for several seconds at a time.

I therefore totally support making this the default, but I know some
people will be against it :-)

Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/