[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BF8200E.6020807@cesarb.net>
Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 15:18:54 -0300
From: Cesar Eduardo Barros <cesarb@...arb.net>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm/swapfile.c: better messages for swap_info_get
Em 22-05-2010 15:13, Borislav Petkov escreveu:
>> @@ -522,16 +522,16 @@ static struct swap_info_struct *swap_info_get(swp_entry_t entry)
>> return p;
>>
>> bad_free:
>> - printk(KERN_ERR "swap_free: %s%08lx\n", Unused_offset, entry.val);
>> + printk(KERN_ERR "swap_info_get: %s%08lx\n", Unused_offset, entry.val);
>
> Why not let the compiler do it for ya:
>
> printk(KERN_ERR "%s: %s%08lx\n", __func__, Unused_offset, entry.val);
>
> ?... etc.
See the third patch. This function becomes swap_info_get_unlocked(), and
swap_info_get() becomes a small wrapper around it. Yet, I still want to
keep printing swap_info_get: in the error message (whether it is locked
or not makes no difference from the point of view of the error messsage).
--
Cesar Eduardo Barros
cesarb@...arb.net
cesar.barros@...il.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists