[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BF7507F.20805@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 20:33:19 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
CC: Brian Bloniarz <bmb@...enacr.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>, chris.mason@...cle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Export tsc related information in sysfs
On 05/21/2010 07:03 PM, john stultz wrote:
>
> Yea, the relative instability of the tsc calibration at boot is an
> issue for folks who want very very precise timekeeping immediately
> after a reboot.
>
> I proposed a solution to this awhile back via a boot option users
> could use to specify the tsc_khz freq, so it would be consistent from
> boot to boot. See: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/22492/
>
> It didn't really go anywhere due to a lack of public interest.
> However, if you're interested in playing with it, I can try to revive
> the patch.
>
The point about NTP is a very good one; with NTP you *really* want what
you're adjusting to be directly related to the crystal oscillator -- as
what it is; precision over accuracy as NTP takes care of accuracy but
not precision.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists