[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100523183353.GB1408@liondog.tnic>
Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 20:33:53 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf: Add persistent events
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Date: Sun, May 23, 2010 at 08:15:13PM +0200
> On Sat, 2010-05-22 at 21:00 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > Register and enable events marked as persistent right after perf events
> > has initialized.
> >
> > Not-yet-signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
>
> Nah, this is totally wrong.
>
> A persistent event would simply be a regular event, but created by the
> kernel and not tied to a file-desc's lifetime.
So you're saying the trace_mce_record() tracepoint for example should
be created completely internally in the kernel and cease to be a
tracepoint? Will it still be able to be selected by perf -e?
Please elaborate.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists