[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100523185411.GA5608@liondog.tnic>
Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 20:54:11 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf: Add persistent events
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Date: Sun, May 23, 2010 at 08:40:47PM +0200
> > > A persistent event would simply be a regular event, but created by the
> > > kernel and not tied to a file-desc's lifetime.
> >
> > So you're saying the trace_mce_record() tracepoint for example should
> > be created completely internally in the kernel and cease to be a
> > tracepoint? Will it still be able to be selected by perf -e?
>
> No, it should be a regular tracepoint as far as tracepoints are
> concerned.
>
> But the only thing persistence should add is an instance of a
> perf_event, it should not modify either the perf_event nor the
> tracepoint code.
which means that subsystems which initialize earlier than perf (mce,
for example) should have to be notified when perf is ready so that they
could register a persistent event. How does that sound?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists