[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <25539.1274711817@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 15:36:57 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 1/1] ptrace: PTRACE_GETFDPIC: fix the unsafe usage of child->mm
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
> Now that Mike Frysinger unified the FDPIC ptrace code, we can fix
> the unsafe usage of child->mm in ptrace_request(PTRACE_GETFDPIC).
>
> We have the reference to task_struct, and ptrace_check_attach()
> verified the tracee is stopped. But nothing can protect from
> SIGKILL after that, we must not assume child->mm != NULL.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Does it make sense to move the call to get_task_mm() up to sys_ptrace() since
several ptrace functions use it? The mm pointer could then be handed down the
ptrace hierarchy.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists