[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100524181343.GB6033@core.coreip.homeip.net>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 11:13:43 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se>
Cc: Ping Cheng <pinglinux@...il.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@...ia.com>,
Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@...-t.net>,
Benjamin Tissoires <tissoire@...a.fr>,
Stephane Chatty <chatty@...c.fr>,
Rafi Rubin <rafi@...s.upenn.edu>,
Michael Poole <mdpoole@...ilus.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] input: mt: Document the MT event slot protocol (rev4)
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 08:02:40PM +0200, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
> Ping Cheng wrote:
> > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se> wrote:
> >> Ping Cheng wrote:
> >>> What I am thinking is that we only need one SYN_ call for both _MT_
> >>> and regular data combined, which is a call to input_sync() at the end
> >>> of the whole packet. The SYN_MT_ can be replaced by the following
> >>> example, which I think is more "client-friendly". This solution is
> >>> based on the fact that the major difference between type A and type B
> >>> is whether we need to filter the data or not:
> >>>
> >>> ABS_MT_RANDOM 0
> >>> ABS_MT_POSITION_X x[0]
> >>> ABS_MT_POSITION_Y y[0]
> >>> ABS_MT_ RANDOM 1
> >>> ABS_MT_POSITION_X x[1]
> >>> ABS_MT_POSITION_Y y[1]
> >>> SYN_REPORT
> >>>
> >>> input_set_abs_params(input_dev, ABS_MT_RANDOM, 0, 2, 0, 0);
> >>>
> >>> would tell the clients that they can expect two random touches.
> >> And if you do s/RANDOM/SLOT/, you end up with what? ;-)
> >
> > Haha, I know what you are thinking :).
> >
> > Maybe I didn't make my point clear. I didn't mean to make SLOT
> > backward compatible. I meant to replace SYN_MT_REPORT event with the
> > ABS_MT_ RANDOM label so we only sync the whole packet once at the end.
> > This way both types of MT_ data follow the same input event reporting
> > flow....
>
> You mean changing the type A protocol, breaking the current code base? That is a
> big no-no.
>
We, however, could say that SYN_MT_REPORT may be omitted by the drivers
using slotting mechanism.
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists