[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BFAC34C.5020606@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 11:19:56 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>
CC: john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Brian Bloniarz <bmb@...enacr.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>, chris.mason@...cle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Export tsc related information in sysfs
On 05/24/2010 11:13 AM, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> Just wondering: If one were to put an ultra-precise scope on
> a processor, how far off would the calibrated value be? I'd
> imagine the process of calibrating one unknown crystal against
> a second crystal which has a known-but-not-highly-precise
> frequency, though good enough for most purposes, is not particularly
> accurate. In other words, maybe the stamped rate is more accurate
> than the calibrated rate anyway?
No. Not even close.
A spread-spectrum clock is inaccurate by entire percentage points.
A non-spread clock is typically ±50 ppm with typical consumer PC
oscillators, ±1 ppm with non-crappy but still cheap oscillators (e.g.
used in cell phones.)
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists