[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100524190804.GA21874@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 20:08:04 +0100
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>,
Arve Hj?nnev?g <arve@...roid.com>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>, magnus.damm@...il.com,
mark gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Geoff Smith <geoffx.smith@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 6)
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 08:57:54PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> And btw I do have wakelock-less implementation of autosleep, that only
> sleeped the machine when nothing was ready to run. It was called
> "sleepy linux". Should I dig it out?
As has been explained several times now, that's not equivalent. The
difference is what makes this a hard problem. If a usecase is valid and
nobody can come up with a convincing explanation of what an elegant
solution would look like, then the ugly solution wins.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists