linux-kernel - Re: [patch] caif: remove unneeded null check in caif

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTikM6_-YgLcBtcxN_TA1ISHkRk6fCEJVOS7pRZel@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 24 May 2010 21:56:01 +0200
From:	Sjur Brændeland <sjurbren@...il.com>
To:	Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>,
	Sjur Braendeland <sjur.brandeland@...ricsson.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] caif: remove unneeded null check in caif_connect()

Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com> wrote:
> We already dereferenced uaddr towards the start of the function when we
> checked that "uaddr->sa_family != AF_CAIF".  Both the check here and the
> earlier check were added in bece7b2398d0: "caif: Rewritten socket
> implementation".  Before that patch, we assumed that we recieved a valid
> pointer for uaddr, and based on that, I have removed this check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
Thanks Looks good,
Acked-by: Sjur Braendeland <sjur.brandeland@...ricsson.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/