[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100524230351.224349120@clark.site>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 15:59:53 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc: stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [21/34] x86, amd: Check X86_FEATURE_OSVW bit before accessing OSVW MSRs
2.6.34-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
From: Andreas Herrmann <herrmann.der.user@...glemail.com>
commit f01487119dda3d9f58c9729c7361ecc50a61c188 upstream.
If host CPU is exposed to a guest the OSVW MSRs are not guaranteed
to be present and a GP fault occurs. Thus checking the feature flag is
essential.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>
LKML-Reference: <20100427101348.GC4489@...erich.amd.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 12 +++++++-----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
@@ -459,11 +459,13 @@ static int __cpuinit check_c1e_idle(cons
* check OSVW bit for CPUs that are not affected
* by erratum #400
*/
- rdmsrl(MSR_AMD64_OSVW_ID_LENGTH, val);
- if (val >= 2) {
- rdmsrl(MSR_AMD64_OSVW_STATUS, val);
- if (!(val & BIT(1)))
- goto no_c1e_idle;
+ if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_OSVW)) {
+ rdmsrl(MSR_AMD64_OSVW_ID_LENGTH, val);
+ if (val >= 2) {
+ rdmsrl(MSR_AMD64_OSVW_STATUS, val);
+ if (!(val & BIT(1)))
+ goto no_c1e_idle;
+ }
}
return 1;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists