linux-kernel - [12/34] cifs: guard against hardlinking directories

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100524230350.417271635@clark.site>
Date:	Mon, 24 May 2010 15:59:44 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc:	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
	Steve French <sfrench@...ibm.com>
Subject: [12/34] cifs: guard against hardlinking directories

2.6.34-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>

commit 3d69438031b00c601c991ab447cafb7d5c3c59a6 upstream.

When we made serverino the default, we trusted that the field sent by the
server in the "uniqueid" field was actually unique. It turns out that it
isn't reliably so.

Samba, in particular, will just put the st_ino in the uniqueid field when
unix extensions are enabled. When a share spans multiple filesystems, it's
quite possible that there will be collisions. This is a server bug, but
when the inodes in question are a directory (as is often the case) and
there is a collision with the root inode of the mount, the result is a
kernel panic on umount.

Fix this by checking explicitly for directory inodes with the same
uniqueid. If that is the case, then we can assume that using server inode
numbers will be a problem and that they should be disabled.

Fixes Samba bugzilla 7407

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
Reviewed-and-Tested-by: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <sfrench@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>

---
 fs/cifs/cifsglob.h |    1 +
 fs/cifs/inode.c    |   21 +++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
+++ b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
@@ -499,6 +499,7 @@ struct dfs_info3_param {
 #define CIFS_FATTR_DFS_REFERRAL		0x1
 #define CIFS_FATTR_DELETE_PENDING	0x2
 #define CIFS_FATTR_NEED_REVAL		0x4
+#define CIFS_FATTR_INO_COLLISION	0x8
 
 struct cifs_fattr {
 	u32		cf_flags;
--- a/fs/cifs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/inode.c
@@ -610,6 +610,16 @@ cifs_find_inode(struct inode *inode, voi
 	if (CIFS_I(inode)->uniqueid != fattr->cf_uniqueid)
 		return 0;
 
+	/*
+	 * uh oh -- it's a directory. We can't use it since hardlinked dirs are
+	 * verboten. Disable serverino and return it as if it were found, the
+	 * caller can discard it, generate a uniqueid and retry the find
+	 */
+	if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) && !list_empty(&inode->i_dentry)) {
+		fattr->cf_flags |= CIFS_FATTR_INO_COLLISION;
+		cifs_autodisable_serverino(CIFS_SB(inode->i_sb));
+	}
+
 	return 1;
 }
 
@@ -629,15 +639,22 @@ cifs_iget(struct super_block *sb, struct
 	unsigned long hash;
 	struct inode *inode;
 
+retry_iget5_locked:
 	cFYI(1, ("looking for uniqueid=%llu", fattr->cf_uniqueid));
 
 	/* hash down to 32-bits on 32-bit arch */
 	hash = cifs_uniqueid_to_ino_t(fattr->cf_uniqueid);
 
 	inode = iget5_locked(sb, hash, cifs_find_inode, cifs_init_inode, fattr);
-
-	/* we have fattrs in hand, update the inode */
 	if (inode) {
+		/* was there a problematic inode number collision? */
+		if (fattr->cf_flags & CIFS_FATTR_INO_COLLISION) {
+			iput(inode);
+			fattr->cf_uniqueid = iunique(sb, ROOT_I);
+			fattr->cf_flags &= ~CIFS_FATTR_INO_COLLISION;
+			goto retry_iget5_locked;
+		}
+
 		cifs_fattr_to_inode(inode, fattr);
 		if (sb->s_flags & MS_NOATIME)
 			inode->i_flags |= S_NOATIME | S_NOCMTIME;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/