[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BFA1BD9.5070302@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 09:25:29 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>
CC: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: MMU: allow more page become unsync at getting
sp time
On 05/24/2010 05:31 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> On 05/23/2010 03:16 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>>
>>> Allow more page become asynchronous at getting sp time, if need create
>>> new
>>> shadow page for gfn but it not allow unsync(level> 1), we should
>>> unsync all
>>> gfn's unsync page
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> +/* @gfn should be write-protected at the call site */
>>> +static void kvm_sync_pages(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn)
>>> +{
>>> + struct hlist_head *bucket;
>>> + struct kvm_mmu_page *s;
>>> + struct hlist_node *node, *n;
>>> + unsigned index;
>>> + bool flush = false;
>>> +
>>> + index = kvm_page_table_hashfn(gfn);
>>> + bucket =&vcpu->kvm->arch.mmu_page_hash[index];
>>> + hlist_for_each_entry_safe(s, node, n, bucket, hash_link) {
>>>
>>>
>> role.direct, role.invalid?
>>
> We only handle unsync pages here, and 'role.direct' or 'role.invalid'
> pages can't become unsync.
>
They will be once the invlpg patch is in...
>
>> Well, role.direct cannot be unsync. But that's not something we want to
>> rely on.
>>
> While we mark the unsync page, we have filtered out the 'role.direct' pages,
> so, i think we not need worry 'role.direct' here. :-)
>
Ok.
--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists