[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BFA1E91.8060706@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 09:37:05 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
CC: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
qemu-devel@...gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] virtio: put last seen used index into
ring itself
On 05/23/2010 07:30 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
>
>>> Maybe we should use atomics on index then?
>>>
>>>
>> This should only be helpful if you access the cacheline several times in
>> a row. That's not the case in virtio (or here).
>>
> So why does it help?
>
We actually do access the cacheline several times in a row here (but not
in virtio?):
> case SHARE:
> while (count< MAX_BOUNCES) {
> /* Spin waiting for other side to change it. */
> while (counter->cacheline1 != count);
>
Broadcast a read request.
> count++;
> counter->cacheline1 = count;
>
Broadcast an invalidate request.
> count++;
> }
> break;
>
> case LOCKSHARE:
> while (count< MAX_BOUNCES) {
> /* Spin waiting for other side to change it. */
> while (__sync_val_compare_and_swap(&counter->cacheline1, count, count+1)
> != count);
>
Broadcast a 'read for ownership' request.
> count += 2;
> }
> break;
>
So RMW should certainly by faster using single-instruction RMW
operations (or using prefetchw).
--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists