lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 25 May 2010 11:51:35 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	piotr@...owicz.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	Divyesh Shah <dpshah@...gle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code:
 icedove-bin/5449

On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 11:47 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 11:43 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > Subject: sched_clock: Add local_clock()
> > > From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> > > Date: Tue May 25 10:48:51 CEST 2010
> > > 
> > > For people who otherwise get to write: cpu_clock(smp_processor_id()),
> > > there is now: local_clock().
> > 
> > This doesnt fix the whole issue. cpu_clock() is local, while the measurements 
> > done in the blk code are global ...
> > 
> > While the warning is fixed this way, the far more serious issue is still 
> > there: time can go backwards if two points of time measurement are on 
> > different CPUs and can mess up the statistics with negative values, etc...
> 
> cpu_clock() is synced on each tick, so the inter-cpu-drift should not
> exceed 2 jiffies.
> 
> But yeah, if they want anything better, they'll have to start caring on
> what cpu which timestamp got taken and use cpu_clock().

For completeness, the previously used sched_clock() isn't synced between
cores at all, and can exhibit unbounded drift.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ