[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTin5PNELUXc6oCHadVyX-YcAEalRSppjz4GMyIBh@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 13:47:30 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Zhang Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC V2 SLEB 00/14] The Enhanced(hopefully) Slab Allocator
Hi David,
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 1:02 PM, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com> wrote:
>> I wouldn't say it's a nightmare, but yes, it could be better. From my
>> point of view SLUB is the base of whatever the future will be because
>> the code is much cleaner and simpler than SLAB.
>
> The code may be much cleaner and simpler than slab, but nobody (to date)
> has addressed the significant netperf TCP_RR regression that slub has, for
> example. I worked on a patchset to do that for a while but it wasn't
> popular because it added some increments to the fastpath for tracking
> data.
Yes and IIRC I asked you to resend the series because while I care a
lot about performance regressions, I simply don't have the time or the
hardware to reproduce and fix the weird cases you're seeing.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists