[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100525123701.GA7876@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 13:37:01 +0100
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc: Philip Langdale <philipl@...rt.org>,
Jeff Garrett <jeff@...rrett.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, luming.yu@...el.com, venki@...gle.com
Subject: Re: acpi_idle: Very idle Core i7 machine never enters C3
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 01:43:26AM -0400, Len Brown wrote:
> I'm told by the hardware guys that BM_STS is _not_ always
> a NOP, and so we're not supposed to simply ignore it on C3 --
> though it should be extremely rare that we see it set.
> If it is ever set, it should go on and off depending on
> activity on some latency sensitive device, like out on the LPC.
> It may be possible for the BIOS writer to configure the chipset
> so that BM_STS is enabled always, presumably to accomodate
> some latency sensitve device -- or maybe by mistake.
On some hardware we've seen BM_STS be enabled approximately 50% of the
time without any obvious cause.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists