[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BFBC393.50207@osadl.org>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 14:33:23 +0200
From: Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] tracing/sched: Fix task states in sched switch event
Hi Ingo,
>>> Hm, this is totally unreadable. What does 'TASK_STATE_X' mean??
>> Would this be better?
>> +#define MAKE_TASK_STATE_STRING(num) TASK_STATE_##num " (" DESCR_TASK_STATE_##num ")"
>> static const char *task_state_array[] = {
>> - "R (running)", /* 0 */
>> - "S (sleeping)", /* 1 */
>> - "D (disk sleep)", /* 2 */
>> - "T (stopped)", /* 4 */
>> - "t (tracing stop)", /* 8 */
>> - "Z (zombie)", /* 16 */
>> - "X (dead)", /* 32 */
>> - "x (dead)", /* 64 */
>> - "K (wakekill)", /* 128 */
>> - "W (waking)", /* 256 */
>> + MAKE_TASK_STATE_STRING(0),
>> + MAKE_TASK_STATE_STRING(1),
>> + MAKE_TASK_STATE_STRING(2),
>> + MAKE_TASK_STATE_STRING(4),
>> + MAKE_TASK_STATE_STRING(8),
>> + MAKE_TASK_STATE_STRING(16),
>> + MAKE_TASK_STATE_STRING(32),
>> + MAKE_TASK_STATE_STRING(64),
>> + MAKE_TASK_STATE_STRING(128),
>> + MAKE_TASK_STATE_STRING(256)
>
> The whole enumeration there is pointless in that .c file - it tells nothing to
> the code reader.
>
> If it cannot be expressed in a meaningful way then introduce
> TASK_STATE_STRINGS_INIT construct that is defined next to the strings (in a .h
> file or so) - that way it's a coherent whole.
This is what I did and submitted some time ago. Is there anything else
you want me to change?
Thanks,
Carsten.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists