linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf_events: fix event scheduling issues introduced by transactional API (take 2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1274794518.5882.1280.camel@twins>
Date:	Tue, 25 May 2010 15:35:18 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	eranian@...gle.com
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, paulus@...ba.org,
	davem@...emloft.net, fweisbec@...il.com, acme@...radead.org,
	ming.m.lin@...el.com, perfmon2-devel@...ts.sf.net,
	eranian@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf_events: fix event scheduling issues introduced by
 transactional API (take 2)

On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 15:20 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:

> With this patch, you can now overcommit the PMU even with pinned
> system-wide events present and still get valid counts.

Does this patch differ from the one you send earlier?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/