lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100525152115.GB3227@barrios-desktop>
Date:	Wed, 26 May 2010 00:21:15 +0900
From:	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
To:	Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>
Cc:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
	Cyp <cyp561@...il.com>, driverdev <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] zram: generic RAM based compressed R/W block
 devices

Hi, Nitin. 

On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 07:48:02PM +0530, Nitin Gupta wrote:
> Creates RAM based block devices: /dev/zramX (X = 0, 1, ...).
> Pages written to these disks are compressed and stored in memory
> itself. These disks allow very fast I/O and compression provides
> good amounts of memory savings.
> 
> This is enhancement over existing ramzswap driver which creates
> virtual block devices (/dev/ramzswapX) which could be used only
> as swap disks.
> 
> Now, with the ability to handle any kind of I/O request, zram
> devices have lot more use cases:
>  - /tmp storage
>  - various caches under /var
>  - swap disks
>  - maybe even more! :)

Wow, it looks good to me. 

As a matter of fact, when I saw your descriptoin, I thought we can merge 
your feature into brd. But I changed my mind due to following as 

First of all, ramfs supports direct I/O. So it's hard to support compression. 
If we can select optionable config, it would make brd code complicated or ugly.
That's because ramzswap uses own allocator, compression, extended ioctl and so on. 
And some users might regard write with important than read without considering space.
So it would be better to keep other block device for easy use and clear code. 

I will review this code when I have a time. 
Thanks, Nitin. 

-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ