[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BFC0070.9010408@jaysonking.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 11:53:04 -0500
From: "Jayson R. King" <dev@...sonking.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...nel.org, stable-review@...nel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
"Jayson R. King" <dev@...sonking.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [10/24] vfs: Add no_nrwrite_index_update writeback control flag
On 05/25/2010 06:12 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 03:28:06PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
>> 2.6.27-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
>
> NACK. This has been shown to cause severe writeback regression for
> other filesystems and is beeing reverted in mianline.
It can't be reverted directly (you'll get a build failure) since the
next ext4 patch in this -stable series depends on it.
There's a commit from Ted Ts'o in the ext4 git, "ext4: Use our own
write_cache_pages()", which removes the dependency, but that patch is
not yet in mainline so isn't a -stable candidate. When/if that patch
hits mainline, it can be added to -stable and this patch dropped/reverted.
Jayson
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists