[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BFB56F1.1080200@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 12:49:53 +0800
From: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
To: "J. R. Okajima" <hooanon05@...oo.co.jp>
CC: opurdila@...acom.com, davem@...emloft.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: proc_dointvec() and write
On 05/24/10 22:32, J. R. Okajima wrote:
> The commit 00b7c3395aec3df43de5bd02a3c5a099ca51169f
> "sysctl: refactor integer handling proc code"
> modified the behaviour of writing to /proc.
>
> Before the commit, write("1\n") to /proc/sys/kernel/printk succeeded. But
> now it returns EINVAL. Is this intended change? If not, how about this
> patch?
>
Hmm, odd, I tested other proc files, I see no problem.
I am wondering why /proc/sys/kernel/printk is special here.
I will be back later.
>
> J. R. Okajima
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sysctl.c b/kernel/sysctl.c
> index 4c93486..5058e12 100644
> --- a/kernel/sysctl.c
> +++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
> @@ -2262,6 +2272,8 @@ static int __do_proc_dointvec(void *tbl_data, struct ctl_table *table,
> if (write) {
> left -= proc_skip_spaces(&kbuf);
>
> + if (!left)
> + break;
> err = proc_get_long(&kbuf,&left,&lval,&neg,
> proc_wspace_sep,
> sizeof(proc_wspace_sep), NULL);
> @@ -2288,7 +2306,7 @@ static int __do_proc_dointvec(void *tbl_data, struct ctl_table *table,
>
> if (!write&& !first&& left&& !err)
> err = proc_put_char(&buffer,&left, '\n');
> - if (write&& !err)
> + if (write&& !err&& left)
> left -= proc_skip_spaces(&kbuf);
> free:
> if (write) {
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists