[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100525231308.GE5370@nowhere>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 01:13:10 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@...onical.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Tracing configuration review
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 06:01:06PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 22:17 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 03:46:08PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 15:31 -0400, Chase Douglas wrote:
> > > > # CONFIG_SCHED_TRACER is not set (headed for deprecation?)
> > >
> > > Although it is headed for deprecation, I think it still gets set by
> > > other tracers, since it has the code to initiate the comm reader.
> >
> >
> >
> > Doesn't actually CONTEXT_SWITCH_TRACER has the code for the
> > comm things?
> >
>
> Ah, I was confused. But then the SCHED_TRACER is the wakeup tracer, and
> that is heading for deprecation??
It would be nice if we can make it a ftrace_event_call, so that we
can control it like any other trace event.
But for now we don't have any replacement, so it is not yet deprecated.
That's why I said "in the long term" ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists