lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 25 May 2010 23:14:48 +0000
From:	Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
To:	Ky Srinivasan <ksrinivasan@...ell.com>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
CC:	"'devel@...verdev.osuosl.org'" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
	"'virtualization@...ts.osdl.org'" <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
	"'linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] staging: hv: Fix race condition on IC channel
	 initialization

> From: Ky Srinivasan [mailto:ksrinivasan@...ell.com]
> You would need to protect the increment, if interrupts are going to
> come in on any cpu and update the counter. While in your current
> implementation interrupts are only delivered on cpu0, it is still
> probably good to deal with the more general case and protect the
> counter.
> 
> On a slightly different note, why don't you make the synchronization
> more explicit than what you currently have: Rather than polling the
> variable in a loop, why don't you put that context to sleep and the
> interrupt context that updates the count would be responsible for
> issuing the wakeup when the conditions are appropriate - when all
> channels are initialized.

Thank you for the suggestion. I will keep the counter atomic to handle 
more general case potentially. To ensure channels are ready before 
vmbus_init() returns, I used an event waiting mechanism instead of 
polling the variable periodically. A modified patch will be submitted 
soon.

Thanks,

- Haiyang

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ