linux-kernel - Re: [Nios2-dev] [PATCH] ethoc: fix null dereference in ethoc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4BFB6B4B.3020107@zhaw.ch>
Date:	Tue, 25 May 2010 08:16:43 +0200
From:	Tobias Klauser <klto@...w.ch>
To:	nios2-dev@...c.et.ntust.edu.tw
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, thierry.reding@...onic-design.de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [Nios2-dev] [PATCH] ethoc: fix null dereference in ethoc_probe

On 05/24/2010 04:44 AM, Thomas Chou wrote:
> Dan reported the patch 0baa080c75c: "ethoc: use system memory
> as buffer" introduced a potential null dereference.
> 
>   1060  free:
>   1061          if (priv->dma_alloc)
>                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 	priv can be null here.
> 
> He also suggested that the error handling is not complete.
> 
> This patch fixes the null priv issue and improves resources
> releasing in ethoc_probe() and ethoc_remove().
> 
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Chou <thomas@...ron.com.tw>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethoc.c |   34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethoc.c b/drivers/net/ethoc.c
> index a8d9250..fddd5f5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethoc.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethoc.c
> @@ -174,6 +174,7 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(buffer_size, "DMA buffer allocation size");
>   * @iobase:	pointer to I/O memory region
>   * @membase:	pointer to buffer memory region
>   * @dma_alloc:	dma allocated buffer size
> + * @io_region_size:	I/O memory region size
>   * @num_tx:	number of send buffers
>   * @cur_tx:	last send buffer written
>   * @dty_tx:	last buffer actually sent
> @@ -193,6 +194,7 @@ struct ethoc {
>  	void __iomem *iobase;
>  	void __iomem *membase;
>  	int dma_alloc;
> +	resource_size_t io_region_size;
>  
>  	unsigned int num_tx;
>  	unsigned int cur_tx;
> @@ -944,6 +946,7 @@ static int ethoc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	priv = netdev_priv(netdev);
>  	priv->netdev = netdev;
>  	priv->dma_alloc = 0;
> +	priv->io_region_size = mmio->end - mmio->start + 1;

Better use the resource_size inline here.

>  	priv->iobase = devm_ioremap_nocache(&pdev->dev, netdev->base_addr,
>  			resource_size(mmio));
                        ^^^
Then you could use the io_region_size here to avoid calculating the size
again.

> @@ -1049,20 +1052,34 @@ static int ethoc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	ret = register_netdev(netdev);
>  	if (ret < 0) {
>  		dev_err(&netdev->dev, "failed to register interface\n");
> -		goto error;
> +		goto error2;
>  	}
>  
>  	goto out;
>  
> +error2:
> +	netif_napi_del(&priv->napi);
>  error:
>  	mdiobus_unregister(priv->mdio);
>  free_mdio:
>  	kfree(priv->mdio->irq);
>  	mdiobus_free(priv->mdio);
>  free:
> -	if (priv->dma_alloc)
> -		dma_free_coherent(NULL, priv->dma_alloc, priv->membase,
> -			netdev->mem_start);
> +	if (priv) {
> +		if (priv->dma_alloc)
> +			dma_free_coherent(NULL, priv->dma_alloc, priv->membase,
> +					  netdev->mem_start);
> +		else if (priv->membase)
> +			devm_iounmap(&pdev->dev, priv->membase);
> +		if (priv->iobase)
> +			devm_iounmap(&pdev->dev, priv->iobase);
> +	}
> +	if (mem)
> +		devm_release_mem_region(&pdev->dev, mem->start,
> +					mem->end - mem->start + 1);

resource_size again

> +	if (mmio)
> +		devm_release_mem_region(&pdev->dev, mmio->start,
> +					mmio->end - mmio->start + 1);

ditto

>  	free_netdev(netdev);
>  out:
>  	return ret;
> @@ -1080,6 +1097,7 @@ static int ethoc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
>  
>  	if (netdev) {
> +		netif_napi_del(&priv->napi);
>  		phy_disconnect(priv->phy);
>  		priv->phy = NULL;
>  
> @@ -1091,6 +1109,14 @@ static int ethoc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		if (priv->dma_alloc)
>  			dma_free_coherent(NULL, priv->dma_alloc, priv->membase,
>  				netdev->mem_start);
> +		else {
> +			devm_iounmap(&pdev->dev, priv->membase);
> +			devm_release_mem_region(&pdev->dev, netdev->mem_start,
> +				netdev->mem_end - netdev->mem_start + 1);
> +		}
> +		devm_iounmap(&pdev->dev, priv->iobase);
> +		devm_release_mem_region(&pdev->dev, netdev->base_addr,
> +			priv->io_region_size);
>  		unregister_netdev(netdev);
>  		free_netdev(netdev);
>  	}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/