linux-kernel - [PATCH 01a/10] perf, trace: Fix !x86 build issue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1274772643.5882.304.camel@twins>
Date:	Tue, 25 May 2010 09:30:43 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 01a/10] perf, trace: Fix !x86 build issue

Subject: perf, trace: Fix !x86 build issue
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Date: Tue May 25 09:22:38 CEST 2010

Patch b7e2ecef92 (perf, trace: Optimize tracepoints by removing
IRQ-disable from perf/tracepoint interaction) made the unfortunate
mistake of assuming the world is x86 only, correct this.

The problem was that perf_fetch_caller_regs() did local_save_flags()
into regs->flags, and I re-used that to remove another
local_save_flags(), forgetting !x86 doesn't have regs->flags.

Do the reverse, remove the local_save_flags() from
perf_fetch_caller_regs() and let the ftrace site do the
local_save_flags() instead.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Acked-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c |    6 +++++-
 kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c  |    4 +++-
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -1717,7 +1717,11 @@ void perf_arch_fetch_caller_regs(struct 
 	 */
 	regs->bp = rewind_frame_pointer(skip + 1);
 	regs->cs = __KERNEL_CS;
-	local_save_flags(regs->flags);
+	/*
+	 * We abuse bit 3 to pass exact information, see perf_misc_flags
+	 * and the comment with PERF_EFLAGS_EXACT.
+	 */
+	regs->flags = 0;
 }
 
 unsigned long perf_instruction_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs)
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c
@@ -157,6 +157,7 @@ __kprobes void *perf_trace_buf_prepare(i
 				       struct pt_regs *regs, int *rctxp)
 {
 	struct trace_entry *entry;
+	unsigned long flags;
 	char *raw_data;
 	int pc;
 
@@ -174,7 +175,8 @@ __kprobes void *perf_trace_buf_prepare(i
 	memset(&raw_data[size - sizeof(u64)], 0, sizeof(u64));
 
 	entry = (struct trace_entry *)raw_data;
-	tracing_generic_entry_update(entry, regs->flags, pc);
+	local_save_flags(flags);
+	tracing_generic_entry_update(entry, flags, pc);
 	entry->type = type;
 
 	return raw_data;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/