[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1274863387.5882.4855.camel@twins>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 10:43:07 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...onice.net>,
Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] PM: Opportunistic suspend support.
On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 22:21 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> Now, we can reject their patches, but that's not going to cause any progress
> to happen, realistically. Quite on the contrary, Android will continue to use
> wakelocks and Android driver writers will continue to ignore the mainline
> and the gap between the two kernel lines will only get wider and wider over
> time.
>
> And what really is the drawback if we merge the patches? Quite frankly,
> I don't see any.
A funny userspace API of questionable use (esp. with the advent of
better hardware and better runtime PM support) which we will have to
support forever seems like a big enough downside.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists