[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1274868484.5882.5176.camel@twins>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 12:08:04 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>
Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>,
felipe.balbi@...ia.com,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 12:02 +0200, Florian Mickler wrote:
> The summary is: The device this kernel is running on dosn't want to
> (or can) rely on userspace to save power. This is because it is an open
> system, without an app-store or the like. Everyone can run what he
> wants.
>
> So anything relying on (all) userspace solves a different problem.
So what stops an application from grabbing a suspend blocker?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists