[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1274869966.5882.5262.camel@twins>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 12:32:46 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>,
felipe.balbi@...ia.com,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 03:25 -0700, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:
> and on systems where the
> same power state can be used from idle and suspend, we use suspend so
> we can stay in the low power state for minutes to hours instead of
> milliseconds to seconds.
So don't you think working on making it possible for systems to be idle
_that_ long would improve things for everybody? as opposed to this
auto-suspend which only improves matters for those that (can) use it?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists