[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikRMBkoFxgaKsxMJ2lOMomTXpiHJDk3rVt0EtwM@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 03:40:44 -0700
From: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>,
felipe.balbi@...ia.com,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)
2010/5/26 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>:
> On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 03:25 -0700, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:
>
>> and on systems where the
>> same power state can be used from idle and suspend, we use suspend so
>> we can stay in the low power state for minutes to hours instead of
>> milliseconds to seconds.
>
> So don't you think working on making it possible for systems to be idle
> _that_ long would improve things for everybody? as opposed to this
> auto-suspend which only improves matters for those that (can) use it?
I'm not preventing anyone from working on improving this. Currently
both the kernel and our user-space code polls way too much. I don't
think it is reasonable to demand that no one should run any user-space
code with periodic timers when we have not even fixed the kernel to
not do this.
--
Arve Hjønnevåg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists