[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100526153948.49fc03d1@schatten.dmk.lab>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 15:39:48 +0200
From: Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: felipe.balbi@...ia.com, Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Paul@...p1.linux-foundation.org" <Paul@...p1.linux-foundation.org>,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)
On Wed, 26 May 2010 14:19:42 +0100
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> > This is a _big_ plus for attracting 3rd party programs. (And of course
> > the thing you don't like).
>
> You would do better to concentrate on technical issues that the
> assignment of malicious intent to other parties.
>
> Alan
This was nothing the kind of! He explicitly said this:
On Wed, 26 May 2010 15:29:32 +0300
Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ia.com> wrote:
> What I find ridiculous is the assumption that kernel should provide good
> power management even for badly written applications. They should work,
> of course, but there's no assumption that the kernel should cope with
> those applications and provide good battery usage on those cases.
And I responded that if the kernel would do this, then that would
be a "_big_ plus for attracting 3d party programs".
I had no intent in attacking anyone or putting word's in someones mouth.
Sorry if this was unclearly written.
Cheers,
Flo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists