lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 26 May 2010 15:56:28 +0200
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	Jacek J <69rydzyk69@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CPU #1 not responding Problem

From: Jacek J <69rydzyk69@...il.com>
Date: Tue, May 25, 2010 at 07:55:52PM +0200

> thanks for your response. Dmesg is in attachment. Error is almost
> unreproducable, seems random. I use 2.6.33 kernel from Arch
> distribution.

So what looks suspicious to me is this

May 23 22:44:54 connexion1 kernel: ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x00] lapic_id[0x00] enabled)
May 23 22:44:54 connexion1 kernel: ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x01] lapic_id[0x01] enabled)
May 23 22:44:54 connexion1 kernel: ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x02] lapic_id[0x02] enabled)
May 23 22:44:54 connexion1 kernel: ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x03] lapic_id[0x03] enabled)
May 23 22:44:54 connexion1 kernel: ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x00] dfl dfl lint[0x1])
May 23 22:44:54 connexion1 kernel: ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x01] dfl dfl lint[0x1])
May 23 22:44:54 connexion1 kernel: ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x02] dfl dfl lint[0x1])
May 23 22:44:54 connexion1 kernel: ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x03] dfl dfl lint[0x1])
May 23 22:44:54 connexion1 kernel: ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x02] address[0xfec00000] gsi_base[0])
May 23 22:44:54 connexion1 kernel: IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 2, version 33, address 0xfec00000, GSI 0-23

and more specifically, the ioapic's id is 2 and it overlaps with the
lapic id 2 of core 2. This could explain why in the broken case you
get only 1 core up. The solution to that is to update your BIOS and
hope that Gigabyte (your board maker) have fixed it already. We've
seen similar initialization problems with b0rked Gigabyte boards, see
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15289 and there the apic
id's were also overlapping.

HTH.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ