[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <x49sk5ebruq.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 11:33:17 -0400
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
jens.axboe@...cle.com, vgoyal@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4 v4] ext3/4: enhance fsync performance when using CFQ
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> writes:
> Hi Jeff,
>
>> This patch series addresses a performance problem experienced when running
>> io_zone with small file sizes (from 4KB up to 8MB) and including fsync in
>> the timings. A good example of this would be the following command line:
>> iozone -s 64 -e -f /mnt/test/iozone.0 -i 0
>> As the file sizes get larger, the performance improves. By the time the
>> file size is 16MB, there is no difference in performance between runs
>> using CFQ and runs using deadline. The storage in my testing was a NetApp
>> array connected via a single fibre channel link. When testing against a
>> single SATA disk, the performance difference is not apparent.
>
> offtopic:
>
> Can this patch help to reduce a pain of following much small files issue?
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=578635
Perhaps. I don't have a debian system handy to test that, though.
Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists