[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100526120904.00fe134c.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 12:09:04 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Rabin VINCENT <rabin.vincent@...ricsson.com>
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
"rtc-linux@...glegroups.com" <rtc-linux@...glegroups.com>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
STEricsson_nomadik_linux <STEricsson_nomadik_linux@...t.st.com>,
Virupax SADASHIVPETIMATH
<virupax.sadashivpetimath@...ricsson.com>,
Linus WALLEIJ <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
Srinidhi KASAGAR <srinidhi.kasagar@...ricsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: AB8500 RTC driver
On Wed, 26 May 2010 17:41:51 +0530
Rabin VINCENT <rabin.vincent@...ricsson.com> wrote:
> All your other comments should be addressed in the updated patch below.
> Thanks.
<generates the diff>
> diff -puN drivers/rtc/Kconfig~rtc-ab8500-rtc-driver-update drivers/rtc/Kconfig
> --- a/drivers/rtc/Kconfig~rtc-ab8500-rtc-driver-update
> +++ a/drivers/rtc/Kconfig
> @@ -614,7 +614,6 @@ config RTC_DRV_AB3100
> config RTC_DRV_AB8500
> tristate "ST-Ericsson AB8500 RTC"
> depends on AB8500_CORE
> - default y
> help
> Select this to enable the ST-Ericsson AB8500 power management IC RTC
> support. This chip contains a battery- and capacitor-backed RTC.
> diff -puN drivers/rtc/rtc-ab8500.c~rtc-ab8500-rtc-driver-update drivers/rtc/rtc-ab8500.c
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ab8500.c~rtc-ab8500-rtc-driver-update
> +++ a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ab8500.c
> @@ -46,16 +46,25 @@
> #define COUNTS_PER_SEC (0xF000 / 60)
> #define AB8500_RTC_EPOCH 2000
>
> +static const unsigned long ab8500_rtc_time_regs[] = {
> + AB8500_RTC_WATCH_TMIN_HI_REG, AB8500_RTC_WATCH_TMIN_MID_REG,
> + AB8500_RTC_WATCH_TMIN_LOW_REG, AB8500_RTC_WATCH_TSECHI_REG,
> + AB8500_RTC_WATCH_TSECMID_REG
> +};
> +
> +static const unsigned long ab8500_rtc_alarm_regs[] = {
> + AB8500_RTC_ALRM_MIN_HI_REG, AB8500_RTC_ALRM_MIN_MID_REG,
> + AB8500_RTC_ALRM_MIN_LOW_REG
> +};
Well, it wasn't necessary to move these into file-global scope. It
would be nicer to leave them in function scope, really. I was just
pointing out that the `static' was missing, although unnecessary due to
compiler magic.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists