[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <27F9C60D11D683428E133F85D2BB4A53043E3EE6A3@dlee03.ent.ti.com>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 15:19:07 -0500
From: "Arce, Abraham" <x0066660@...com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"tony@...mide.com" <tony@...mide.com>,
"Shilimkar, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
"Ha, Tristram" <Tristram.Ha@...rel.com>
Subject: RE: NULL Pointer Deference: NFS & Telnet
Thanks Eric, David,
[..]
> > > > - if (skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags) {
> > > > + if (skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags && skb_has_frags(skb)) {
> > > > int i;
> > > > for (i = 0; i < skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags; i++)
> > > > put_page(skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[i].page);
> > >
> > > skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags counts the number of entries contained
> > > in the skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[] array.
> > >
> > > This has nothing to do with the frag list pointer,
> > > skb_shinfo(skb)->frag_list, which is what skb_has_frags()
> > > tests.
> > >
> > > You've got some kind of memory corruption going on and it
> > > appears to have nothing to do with the code paths you're
> > > playing with here.
> >
> > Do you have any recommendation on debugging technique/tool for this memory
> corruption issue?
[..]
> It seems quite strange. You have a skb->nr_frags > 0 value, but a
> frags[i].page = 0 value
>
> You might add following function :
>
> shinfo_check(struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> struct skb_shared_info *shinfo = skb_shinfo(skb);
> int i;
>
> WARN_ON(shinfo->nr_frags >= MAX_SKB_FRAGS);
> for (i = 0; i < shinfo->nr_frags; i++)
> WARN_ON(!shinfo->frags[i].page);
> }
>
> And call it from various points, to check who corrupts your skb.
By increasing the allocation length of our rx skbuff the corruption issue is fixed... I have increased it by 2... Were we writing outside our boundaries of skb data?
Please let me know about this approach...
diff --git a/drivers/net/ks8851.c b/drivers/net/ks8851.c
index b4fb07a..6da81e1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ks8851.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ks8851.c
@@ -504,7 +504,7 @@ static void ks8851_rx_pkts(struct ks8851_net *ks)
ks->rc_rxqcr | RXQCR_SDA | RXQCR_ADRFE);
if (rxlen > 0) {
- skb = netdev_alloc_skb(ks->netdev, rxlen + 2 + 8);
+ skb = netdev_alloc_skb(ks->netdev, rxlen + 4 + 8);
if (!skb) {
Best Regards
Abraham
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists