[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1FB5E1D5CA062146B38059374562DF7266B8C72B@TK5EX14MBXC128.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 21:25:31 +0000
From: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
CC: "'linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"'devel@...verdev.osuosl.org'" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
"'virtualization@...ts.osdl.org'" <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
"Hank Janssen" <hjanssen@...rosoft.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] staging: hv: Fix race condition on IC channel
initialization (modified)
> From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@...e.de]
> > + static atomic_t ic_channel_initcnt = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
> Why is this an atomic_t?
As discussed previously, I used atomic_t to handle more general case
if vmbus interrupts happen on every cpu.
> > + VmbusChannelOpen(newChannel, 2 * PAGE_SIZE,
> > + 2 * PAGE_SIZE, NULL, 0,
> > + hv_cb_utils[cnt].callback,
> > + newChannel) == 0) {
> > + hv_cb_utils[cnt].channel = newChannel;
> > + mb();
>
> What is the mb() call for? Why is it necessary? (hint, if you need it,
> something else is really wrong...)
It ensures the channel assignment happens before the wakeup call:
osd_WaitEventSet(ic_channel_ready), if the compiler optimization re-arrange
the execution order.
> Something wierd happened with your indentation here, it doesn't line up
> properly. That call to VmbusChannelOpen() needs to go in a full tab,
> not 4 spaces.
>
> Please always run your patch through the checkpatch.pl script before
> sending it to me.
Sure, I will replace it with TAB. I already ran checkpatch.pl on
this patch -- no error:
staging-next-2.6> scripts/checkpatch.pl 0525-Fix-race-condition-on-IC-channel-initialization.patch
total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 71 lines checked
0525-Fix-race-condition-on-IC-channel-initialization.patch has no obvious style problems and is ready for submission.
> > +struct osd_waitevent *ic_channel_ready;
>
> What's with the "ic_" naming scheme here? It should be "hv_" right?
IC stands for "integration components", such as Shutdown, Timesync,
Heartbeat, etc.
> As you are using this "ic_channel_ready variable only within the
> vmbus_bus_init() call, why not just make it local to there? Then
> there's no need to do the create/init/wait/free sequence outside the
> init call.
>
> The init call should just do all of this for us, right?
The ic_channel_ready variable is called by VmbusChannelProcessOffer / osd_WaitEventSet(ic_channel_ready) to wake up vmbus_init(). So it's
not a local variable.
Thanks,
- Haiyang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists