linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kbuild tree with the kernel-doc tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100527090923.c17a7ed4.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Thu, 27 May 2010 09:09:23 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc:	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, matt mooney <mfm@...eddisk.com>,
	Kirill Smelkov <kirr@....spb.ru>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kbuild tree with the kernel-doc
 tree

Hi Randy,

On Wed, 26 May 2010 09:56:06 -0700 Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> > The kernel-doc tree is a quilt series :-(
> 
> Yes.  and it's viewable without pulling/cloning.  ;)

Ah, I shouldn't reply to emails so late at night :-(

> > You can, of course, see the above commit in the linux-next tree via
> > gitweb on kernel.org.
> 
> Thanks.  Michal, I droppped these 3 patches.  Please keep them in the
> kbuild tree.

If anything, the kernel-doc patches should be kept as they are much more
extensive.  And the conflict was trivial.  The kbuild patch was just
fixing a typo (tey -> they).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped