[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100527110210.GB20625@google.com>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 04:02:10 -0700
From: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Waychison <mikew@...gle.com>,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>,
Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] V4: rwsem changes + down_read_critical() proposal
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:23:59AM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Tue, 25 May 2010 11:27:55 +0200
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > Also, do you really think doing something like:
> >
> > /*
> > * Check the vma index is within the range and do
> > * sequential scan until m_index.
> > */
> > vma = NULL;
> > if ((unsigned long)l < mm->map_count) {
> > vma = mm->mmap;
> > while (l-- && vma)
> > vma = vma->vm_next;
> > goto out;
> > }
> >
> > with preemption disabled is a _good_ thing?
> >
> > People were talking about raising our vma limit of 64k...
All right, this is clearly a problem then.
> Hmm..can't we use something speculative lookup for reading maps ?
> (as we played in several months ago...)
Would you happen to have a link to that conversation / remember the
subject line of the thread ?
Thanks,
--
Michel "Walken" Lespinasse
A program is never fully debugged until the last user dies.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists