lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1005271322010.25605@kaball-desktop>
Date:	Thu, 27 May 2010 13:29:59 +0100
From:	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
CC:	Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@...citrix.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
	Don Dutile <ddutile@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] Unplug emulated disks and nics

On Wed, 26 May 2010, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 05/26/2010 05:27 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > It is needed for LINUX_VERSION_CODE, see below:
> >
> >   
> >>> +
> >>> +#define XEN_IOPORT_MAGIC_VAL 0x49d2
> >>> +#define XEN_IOPORT_LINUX_PRODNUM 0xffff
> >>> +#define XEN_IOPORT_LINUX_DRVVER  ((LINUX_VERSION_CODE << 8) + 0x0)
> >>>       
> 
> Ah.  What's that for?  Does qemu change its behaviour depending on the
> kernel version?  Ah, something to do with blacklisting.  But is the
> Linux kernel version the most useful value here?  Shouldn't there be
> some kind of separate version number?  And what's the blacklisting stuff
> for anyway?
> 

Well at the moment qemu doesn't actually change behaviour but as part of
the protocol negotiation the pv drivers are supposed to communicate
their version number to qemu. Also it is possible to blacklist a
particular pv driver version in qemu even though I don't think it is
actually used at the moment.
Regarding what version number should we give to qemu, I guess we could
have our own separate version number here, independent fron the linux
version. I'll start from 1 then.


> Wow, this interface is perverse.  It reuses the same IO port but changes
> function depending on the size of the IO?  Again, wow.
 
Yeah, before you ask, I didn't write it :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ